بررسی نقش تعدیلی حاکمیت شرکتی بر تعامل جریان های نقد آزاد و فرصت های رشد در همگام سازی بازده سهام

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، واحد بناب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، بناب، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد بناب، بناب، ایران

3 استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحد بناب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بناب، ایران

4 استادیار گرو ه حسابداری، واحد صوفیان، دانشگا ه ازاد اسلامی، صوفیان، ایران

چکیده

همزمانی بازدۀ سهام حوزه نسبتاً جدیدی در پژوهش های مالی و اقتصادی است که رابطة نزدیکی با توسعة اقتصادی، ثبات بازارهای مالی و کارایی بازار دارد. هدف کلی پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش تعدیلی حاکمیت شرکتی بر تعامل جریان های نقد آزاد و فرصت های رشد در همگام سازی بازده سهام در شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می باشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران از سال 1385تا 1396می باشد. روش تحقیق به کارگرفته شده در این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ روش و ماهیت، تحقیق همبستگی یا همخوانی است. نتایج آزمون فرضیه ها نشان می دهد کیفیت حاکمیت شرکتی بر تعامل بین بازده سالانه سهام، تعامل بین تمرکز مالکیت، گردش معاملات و همگام سازی بازده سهام تاثیر معنی داری دارد. اما کیفیت حاکمیت شرکتی بر تعامل بین عمر شرکت، اندازه شرکت، رشد شرکت، نقدشوندگی و همگام سازی بازده سهام تاثیر معنی داری ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the adjustment effect of corporate governance on the interaction of free cash flows and growth opportunities in synchronizing stock returns

نویسندگان [English]

  • Neda Rezaei 1
  • asgar pakmaram 2
  • Rasoul ABDI 3
  • yaghoub aghdam mazraeh 4
1 Department of Accounting,bonab,branch,islamic azad university,bonab,iran
2 Corresponding Author: Associate Prof., Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University Bonab Branch, Bonab, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor. Department of Accounting, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran
4 Department of Accountingt,Sofian Branch,Islamic Azad University,Sofian,Iran
چکیده [English]

Concurrent equity return is a relatively new field in financial and economic research that is closely related to economic development, financial market stability, and market efficiency .The overall purpose of this study is to investigate the role of corporate governance adjustment on the interaction of free cash flows and growth opportunities in synchronizing stock returns in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical population of this study is the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2006 to 2017. The research method used in this research is applied in terms of purpose and correlation or consistency in terms of method and nature. The test results of the hypotheses show the quality of corporate governance on the interaction between annual stock returns , Interaction between ownership concentration, transaction turnover and stock return synchronization A significant effect But the quality of corporate governance depends on the interaction between the life of the company, the size of the company, the growth of the company, Liquidity and synchronization of stock returns It has no significant effect.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corporate governance
  • Free cash flows
  • Growth opportunities
  • Synchronize stock returns
  1. احمدپور، احمد و هادیان، سید امین(1394). بررسی تغییرات مربوط بودن اطلاعات حسابداری" بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی، دوره 22، شماره 1، صفحه 1-22.
2.       افلاطونی، عباس (1395). بررسی تأثیر ریسک ورشکستگی شرکت و نوسان‎های سیستماتیک و ویژۀ بازده‌ سهام بر میزان نگهداشت وجه ‌نقد، دوره 22، شماره 1، 1394، صص 21-40.
3.       کردستانی، غلامرضا و ایرانشاهی ، محمد (1391). تاثیر محافظه کاری بر میزان مربوط بودن اطلاعات حسابداری به ارزش سهام" نشریه دانش حسابرسی، دوره دوازده، شماره 46.
4.       همت فر، محمود و منصور مقدسی. (1392). رابطه بین کیفیت افشا بر ارزش سهام شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، دوره 20، شماره 2، صص 147-133.
  1. Agarwal P. Institutional Ownership and Stock Liquidity 2008; Working paper. http://ssrn.com/
  2. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H.; D. Collins, and R. LaFond, (2006), "The Effects of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Credit Ratings", Journal of Accounting and Economics42 (1- 2), PP. 203-43.
  3. Aspris, A. & Frino, A. (2013). board independence, stock liquidity and price efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(2), 101-154.
  4. Albassam, W. (2014). Corporate governance, voluntary disclosure and financial
    performance: ban empirical analysis of Saudi listed firms using a mixedmethods research design
    . PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.
  5. Ball R, S.P. Kothari, Robin. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings", journal of accounting & economics 2000; 29: 1-51.
  6. Bae, K. H., Lim, C., & Wei, K. J. (2006). Corporate Governance and Conditional Skewness in the World’s Stock Markets. Journal of Business,79(6).
  7. Beshkouh, M. & Jahangiri, L. A. (2013). The effect of problem agency of free cash flows on earnings and book values relevance. The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 20 (1): 35-52. (in Persian)
  8. Bushee, B. J., Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Hamm, S. J. (2010). The role of the business press as an information intermediary. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 1-19.
  9. Campbell, J. Y., Lettau, M., Malkiel, B. G., & Xu, Y. (2001). Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 1-43
  10. Chan, K., & Hameed, A. (2006). Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 115-147.
  11. Chen, Q., Goldstein, I., & Jiang, W. (2001). Price informativeness and investment sensitivity to stock price. Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 619-650.
  12. Collins W, Maydew E.L and Weiss I.S (1997) "Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earnings and Book Value Over the Past Forty Years". Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, Pp. 39-67.
  13. Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B., Zarowin, P., 2003. Does greater firm-specific return variation mean moreor less informed stock pricing? Journal of Accounting Research 41, 797–836.
  14. Dasgupta, S. Laplante, B., & Mamingi, N., (2010), “Pollution and capital markets in developing countries”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42 (3), 310–335.
  15. V, (2010), " Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle "
    paper is based on Dissertation for degree of Doctor of philosophy,
    University of Wisconsin – Madison. http://ssrn. com/abstract=755804
  16. Elliott, W. Brooke, Krische, D. Susan. Peecher, E. Mark,(2010)” Expected Mispricing: The Joint Influence Of Accounting Transparency And Investor Base” . Journal of Accounting Research, 48: 343-381
  17. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1993: Common risk factor in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Finance, 33, pp. 3-56.
  18. Faks, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting
  19. Gordon, N. & Wu, Q. (2014). Informed trade, uninformed trade, and stock price delay. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2209073
  20. Habib, A., and Azim, I., (2008). Corporate governance and the value relevance of accounting information, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 167- 194.
  21. Haloin, M., & Raviv, A. (20013). Differences of opinion make a horse race. Review of Financial studies, 6(3), 473-506.
  22. Hanlon, D., Navissi, F. & Soepriyanto, G. (2014). The Value Relevance of Deferred Tax Attributed to Asset Revaluations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 14 (2): 1-42.
  23. Jin, L. and S. C. Myers, (2006), “R2 around the World: New Theory and New Tests”, Journal of financial Economics, 79(2), PP. 257-292.
  24. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, managerial and decision economics, vol 25, 537-547.
  25. Kelly, P. J. (2007). Information Efficiency and Firm-Specific Return Variation. Working Paper, Arizona State University
  26. Kevin, C.K.L., Heibatollah, S. & Haiyan, Zh. (2013). Change in the value relevance of accounting information over time: Evidence from the emerging market of china. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economic, 9 (1): 123–135
  27. Kole, S., K Lehn, (1997), "Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance structure, and Survival", American Economic Review 87 (2), PP. 421-25.
  28. Mehrani, S., FaalGhayoumi, A. & Moradi, M. (2012). Relationship among Corporate ownership, Concentrated institutional ownership and value relevance of accounting data. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 3 (11): 31-55. (in Persian)
  29. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?. Journal of Financial Economics. 58 (1–2), 215–260.
  30. Nicolas B, John S (2012) "Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Values for Greek Listed Firms". Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Vol. 18, Pp. 35-61.
  31. Peng, L., & Xiong, W. (2006). Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 563-602.
  32. Piotroski, J., Roulstone, D., 2004. The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry, and firm-specific information into stock prices. Accounting Review 79,1119–1151
  33. Roll, Richard. Schwartz, Eduardo & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar (2005). Liquidity and the Law of One Price: The Case of the Futures/Cash Basi
  34. .Rubin A, Ownership level, ownership concentration and liquidity. Journal of Financial Markets 2007; 10(3): 219–248.
  35. West, K. D. (1988). Dividend innovations and stock price volatility. Econometrica
    :
    37-6