Providing a Conceptual Model of Risk Management with a Resilience Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Zahra Niyazi 1
Bahareh Banitalebi Dehkordi 2
1 Ph.D Student of Accounting ,Shahrekord Branch, , Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord,Iran
2 Associate of Department of Accounting,Shahrekord Branch, , Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord,Iran
10.30495/jik.2024.23562
Abstract
In a world full of complexities, achieving correct risk management is considered as a fundamental and basic concept in creating entrepreneurship and value creation of organizations, especially in the time of uncertainty that prevents companies from acting quickly and incorrectly and to them. It allows flexibility and resilience. . Therefore, the purpose of this research is to first deal with the concepts of risk management and types of risks, as well as resilience patterns in times of uncertainty among investors from the perspective of knowledge, and then to present a conceptual model of risk management with a resilience approach for the first time in Iran. To achieve this goal, using metacombination technique, 58 articles published in reliable scientific databases were evaluated between 2000 and 2021. Then, based on the seven-step approach of Sandlowski and Barroso, the codes were extracted, analyzed and classified. After measuring the reliability and validity of the results, finally the proposed conceptual model of risk management with resilience approach was presented. Based on the findings of this research, the proposed conceptual model includes 10 main codes, each of which explains the management of existing risks from the perspective of positivism and interpretation. Also, in the proposed extended model, risk management has been explained from a conceptual point of view, through a flexible multi-dimensional approach at three micro, medium and macro levels, taking into account parameters such as technology, environment, economy and society.
Keywords
Risk Management
Resilience
Hybridization
  • جعفری، سلیل، گرکـــز، منصور، سعیدی، پرویز، معطوفی، علیرضا. (1398). بررسی نقش عوامل روانشناختی و عملکردی بر تمایل به سرمایه گذاری در بازار سهام با نقش میانجی رضایت سرمایه گذار و ریسک ادارک شده سرمایه گذاران. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، انتشارآنلاین
  • روزبهانی پری، علیرضا، رمضانی، جواد. (1401). پیاده سازی مدیریت ریسک شرکتی و ریز مولفه های آن بر ریسک ورشکستگی شرکتها. دانش سرمایه‌گذاری،11(43)، 245-263.
  • عسگرنژاد نوری، باقر، امکانی، پریسا. (1396). تأثیر مدیریت اثربخش ریسک در عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: نقش واسطه‌ای سرمایۀ فکری و اهرم مالی. نشریه مدیریت دارایی و تامین مالی، 5(2)، 93-112.
  • عطاراسدی، مریم، احدی سرکانی، سیدیوسف، امینی خوزانی، محسن. (1401). تجزیه و تحلیل مدیریت سود و مدیریت ریسک متأثر از رفتارهای متقلبانه (نقش عوامل تعدیل کننده). دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، 15(53), 97-109.
  • لبیب زاده, محمدحسین، رضوان، صالحی، اله کرم، هرمزی، فرشین. (1401). ارزیابی تاثیر سطوح مختلف افشای ریسک شرکت بر ادراکِ سرمایه‌گذاران: تحلیلِ اقلیدسی براساس متن کاوی. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار, 15(54)، 65-86.
  • میربزرگی، سید پوریا، همت فر، محمود، جنانی، محمد حسن. (1402). تبیین الگوی مناسب قدرت ریسک پذیری سرمایه گذاران بورس بر اساس سرمایه اجتماعی با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری. دانش سرمایه‌گذاری، 12(47)، 21-46.
  • میری قهدریجانی، نازنین.، اربابیان، علی اکبر. (1397). تاثیر ساز و کارهای حاکمیت شرکتی بر گزارشگری ریسک، پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 40(10)، 111-136.

 

 

  • Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review ofrecent advances on their foundation. European Journal ofOperational Research, 253(1), 1–13.
  • Biron, M., De Cieri, H., Fulmer, I., Lin, C. H. V., Mayrhofer, W., Nyfoudi, M., et al. (2020). Structuring for innovative responsesto human resource challenges: A skunk works approach. HumanResource Management Review, 100768
  • Bugert, N., Lasch, R. (2023). Analyzing upstream and downstream risk propagation in supply networks by combining Agent-based Modeling and Bayesian networks. J Bus Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01128-2
  • Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-type scales in the
    social sciences. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 19–22.
  • Dellermann, D., Fliaster, A., & Kolloch, M. (2017). Innovation risk indigital business models: The German energy sector. Journal ofBusiness Strategy, 38(5), 35–43.
  • De Smidt, G., & Botzen, W. (2018). Perceptions of corporate cyberrisks and insurance decision-making. The Geneva Papers onRisk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 43(2), 239–274.
  • Dragomir, V. D. (2019). Corporate environmental strategy: Theoret-ical, practical, and ethical aspects. Berlin: Springer.
  • Ferrari, A. M., Volpi, L., Pini, M., Siligardi, C., Garcı ́a-Muin ̃a, F. E., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2019). Building a sustainabilitybenchmarking framework of ceramic tiles based on life cyclesustainability assessment (LCSA). Resources, 8(1), 11.
  • Ferrari, A. M., Volpi, L., Settembre-Blundo, D., & Garcı ́a-Muin ̃a, F. E. (2020). Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) integrating lifecycle inventory (LCI) and Enterprise resource planning (ERP) inan industry 4.0 environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125314.
  • Gleißner, W., Günther, T. & Walkshäusl, C.(2022). Financial sustainability: measurement and empirical evidence. J Bus Econ. 92, 467–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01081-0
  • Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Resilience in the Workplace: A Multilevel Review and Synthesis. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 913–959.
  • Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2018). How resource alignment moderatesthe relationship between environmental innovation strategy and green innovation performance. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33(3), 316–324.
  • Hurmerinta, L., Paavilainen-Ma ̈ntyma ̈ki, E., & Hassett, M. E. (2016 (.Tempus fugit: A hermeneutic approach to the internationalisation process. Management International Review, 56(6), 805–825.
  • Kéfi, S., Holmgren, M., & Scheffer, M. (2016). When can positive interactions cause alternative stable states in ecosystems? Functional Ecology, 30(1), 88-97.
  • Medina-Salgado, M. S., Garcı ́a-Muin ̃a, F. E., Cucchi, M., &Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Adaptive life cycle costing (LCC) modeling and applying to Italy ceramic tile manufacturing sector: Its implication of open innovation. Journal of OpenInnovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 101.
  • Mofijur, M., Fattah, I. R., Alam, M. A., Islam, A. S., Ong, H. C., Rahman, S. A., et al. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: Lessons learntfrom a global pandemic. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 343–359.
  • Nabhani, F., Uhl, C., Kauf, F., & Shokri, A. (2018). Supply chainprocess optimisation via the management of variance. Journal ofManagement Analytics, 5(2), 136–153.
  • Naghshineh, B., Lourenc ̧o, F., Godina, R., Jacinto, C., & Carvalho, H. (2020). A social life cycle assessment framework for additivemanufacturing products. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4459.
  • Ruiz-Martin, C., López-Paredes, A., & Wainer, G. (2018). What we know and do not know about organizational resilience, Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng, 6(1): pp. 11-28.
  • Settembre-Blundo, D., & González-Sánchez, R., & Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F.,( 2021) Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, 22(2), 107-132.
  • Solke, N. S., & Singh, T. P. (2018). Analysis of relationship betweenmanufacturing flexibility and lean manufacturing using structuralequation modelling. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(2), 139–157.
  • Sun, Y., Bi, K., & Yin, S. (2020). Measuring and integrating riskmanagement into green innovation practices for green manufacturing under the global value chain. Sustainability, 12(2), 545.
  • Talebnia, G. & Dehkordi, B.B. (2012), ‘Study of relation between effectiveness audit and management audit’, GSTF Business Review (GBR), Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 92-97.