Designing a Decentralized Framework for International Financial Transfers Based on Smart Contracts and Intelligent Monitoring

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Finance, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Finance, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Finance, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Shahre Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
International financial transfers face significant challenges, including high transaction costs, settlement delays, infrastructural constraints, and operational and compliance risks. This study aims to design a decentralized five-layer framework for managing international financial transfers based on smart contracts and intelligent monitoring. The proposed framework consists of interbank financial exchanges, a decentralized financial social network, digital wallets, stable digital currency, and an integration and operations management layer, which are structured as a process-oriented and controllable architecture.
The research adopts an applied-developmental approach using a mixed-method design. Key components were identified through semi-structured expert interviews and subsequently validated using the fuzzy Delphi method. The findings indicate that the proposed framework, by decomposing the transfer process into distinct layers and embedding horizontal control mechanisms, reduces dependency on centralized pathways, enhances process control, improves transparency and traceability, and strengthens dynamic risk management.
Keywords

  1. احمدی، م. (1403). تحلیل مدل‌های غیرمتمرکز انتقالات مالی بین‌المللی. فصلنامه اقتصاد دیجیتال، 8(3)،45-68.
  2. کریمی، س. و همکاران. (1401). نقش بلاک‌چین در کاهش هزینه‌های تراکنش‌های بین‌المللی. نشریه پژوهش‌های مالی و بانکی، 12(1)، 114–98.
  3. موسوی، ح. (1402). مدیریت ریسک در سیستم‌های مالی غیرمتمرکز. مجله اقتصاد نوین، 9(2)، 40–22.
  4. رحیمی، ک. (1400). تأثیر تحریم‌های اقتصادی بر سیستم‌های پرداخت بین‌المللی. فصلنامه بین‌المللی مطالعات پولی، 6(4)، 89–77.
  5. عباسی، ق. و قاسمی، م. (1402). کاربرد ارزهای دیجیتال در اقتصاد جهانی. نشریه توسعه مالی، 10(3)، 50–34.
  6. نجفی، ر. (1401). الگوریتم‌های اجماع در شبکه‌های غیرمتمرکز مالی. پژوهش‌های فناوری مالی، 11(1)، 72–56.
  7. رضایی، م. (1402). چالش‌های مقیاس‌پذیری در فناوری‌های مالی غیرمتمرکز. فصلنامه سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی و بانکی، 7(3)، 119–101.
  8. شریفی، ن. و همکاران. (1402). بررسی رشد DeFi و پذیرش عمومی ارزهای دیجیتال. نشریه نوآوری‌های مالی، 13(2)، 105–88.
  9. Allen, F., McAndrews, J., & Strahan, P. (2002). E-finance: An introduction. Journal of Financial Services Research, 22(1), 5–27.
  10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2011). Principles for the sound management of operational risk. Bank for International Settlements.
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  12. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2018). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  14. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). Virtual assets: Targeted update on implementation of the FATF standards on virtual assets and VASPs. FATF.
  15. Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2020). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), Article 44.
  16. Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
  17. Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  18. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375.
  19. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
  20. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday.
  21. Žliobaitė, I. (2010). Learning under concept drift: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.4784.
  22. Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: Under the hood. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 104–113.
  23. Friedlmaier, M., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). Disrupting industries with blockchain: The industry, venture capital funding, and regional distribution of blockchain ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  24. Auer, R., Monnet, C., & Shin, H. S. (2022). Central bank digital currencies: motives, economic implications, and the research frontier. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 697–721.
  25. Chen, Y., Bellavitis, C., & Hasan, I. (2022). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 18, e00348.
  26. Gudgeon, L., Perez, D., Harz, D., Livshits, B., & Gervais, A. (2023). DeFi protocols for lending and borrowing: Risks and opportunities. Journal of Financial Stability, 64, 101059.
  27. Di Castri, S., Hohl, S., & Kulenkampff, A. (2023). The next generation of SupTech. Bank for International Settlements.
  28. Bank for International Settlements. (2026). Cross-border payments: Progress and challenges. BIS.