دانش سرمایه‌گذاری

دانش سرمایه‌گذاری

مدلی برای زنجیره تأمین خدمات در صنعت بانکداری: رویکرد برنامه‎ ریزی سه سطحی مبتنی بر تئوری بازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران.
2 گروه ریاضی، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، فیروزکوه، ایران
3 گروه ریاضی ، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران
4 گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران
10.30495/jik.2024.77795.4569
چکیده
این تحقیق با بررسی ادبیات سه حوزه تدوین بودجه و امکانات سازمانی جهت پیشرفت سازمان، برون‌سپاری فرآیندهای بهبود سازمانی و نیز انتخاب تأمین‌کننده به این نتیجه رسیده است که روش‌ها و توصیه‌های انجام شده در این حوزه به‌شدت از یکدیگر مستقل فرض شده‌اند و هیچ‌گاه یک مدل جامع نتوانسته است بنابر اقتضائات یک سازمان، واحد و نیز تأمین کنندگان به سهولت به شرایط پاسخ دهد. از این رو این تحقیق با ارائه یک مدل برنامه‌ریزی ریاضی سه سطحی و بنابر مفهوم تئوری بازی‌ها درصدد بوده است تا این یکپارچگی را رعایت نماید و همانند یک بازی رهبر-پیرو، دائماً تصمیمات را به چالش کشد. مدل ارائه‌شده در فصل سوم توانسته است به‌کمک کدنویسی مناسب در نرم‌افزار متلب به‌کمک ارائه یک الگوریتم فراابتکاری آید تا نه‌تنها ارزش این تحقیق به ارائه مدل آن باشد بلکه توانسته باشد از روش حل مناسبی نیز بهره گیرد. ارائه چندین مثال که با اعداد تصادفی ایجاد شده‌اند توانسته است این مهم را به ثمر رساند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

A Model for the Service Supply Chain in the Banking Industry: A Three-Level Planning Approach Based on Game Theory

نویسندگان English

Amirhossein Mohseni Beikzadeh 1
Shokrollah Ziari 2
Mahdi Amir Miandragh 3
Ebrahim Nik Naghsh 4
1 Department of Industrial Management, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firozkoh, Iran.
2 Department of Mathematics, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firozkoh, Iran
3 Department of Mathematics, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firozkoh, Iran.
4 Department of Industrial Management, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firozkoh, Iran.
چکیده English

By reviewing the literature of three areas of budgeting and organizational facilities for the organization's progress, outsourcing of organizational improvement processes and supplier selection, this research has come to the conclusion that the methods and recommendations made in this area have been assumed to be independent of each other and a comprehensive model has never been able to According to the requirements of an organization, unit and suppliers, it is easy to respond to the conditions. Therefore, this research by presenting a three-level mathematical programming model and according to the concept of game theory has tried to respect this integrity and constantly challenges decisions like a leader-follower game. The model presented in the third chapter has been able to provide a meta-heuristic algorithm with the help of proper coding in MATLAB software so that not only the value of this research is the presentation of its model, but it has also been able to use a suitable solution method. Presenting several examples generated with random numbers has been able to accomplish this.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Organizational Process Improvement
Organizational Unit Level
Outsourcing
Supplier Selection
Multi-level Game
Meta-heuristic Algorithm
1. امیری، مقصود؛ حسنی، زهرا و هادی نژاد، فرهاد. (1401). طراحی مدل تاب آوری زنجیره تأمین در صنعت بانکداری ایران (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم). مدیریت بهره وری، 16(63)، 23-52.
2. پیتر، سنگه، اکبری، حسن، سلطانی، مسعود، 1389، رقص تغییر: چالشهای تغییر پایدار در سازمان یادگیرنده، انتشارات آریانا.
3. خوشنویس، میترا؛ فائزی رازی، فرشاد و فتحی هفشجانی، کیامرث، 1402، تحلیل دینامیکی ریسک پایداری زنجیره تامین خدمات سیستم بانکی، مقاله 12، دوره 15، شماره 53، شهریور 1402، صفحه 175-191.
4. زیدانی، سیدحمید، 1387، برونسپاری دروازه چابکی و استراتژی آن،24-27، مدیریت، سال 19، مرداد شهریور.
5. شاهبندرزاده، حمید و  بهروزی، زهرا. 1400. ارائه مدلی جهت ارزیابی عملکرد زنجیره تأمین شعب بانک ملی تحت یک فرآیند دو مرحله‌ای به کمک تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین، 23(71)، 47-59.
6. عسگری، وحیده؛ کامیابی، یحیی و خلیل پور، مهدی. 1401. ارایه مدلی برای اطمینان بیش از اندازه، اولویت ریسک، رفتار توده وار و سرمایه گذاری ناکارآمد مدیران (رویکرد مبتنی بر تئوری بازی). دانش سرمایه‌گذاری، 11(43)، 439-462.
7. Akarte, M. Durendra, B., Ravi, B. Rangaraj, N. 2001. Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the operational research society, 52: 511-522.
8. Alder, D. (2003). “Making the HR. outsourcing decision”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1), 53- 60.
9. Anderson, E. G. J. & Parker, G. G. 2002. The effect of learning on the make/buy decision. Production and operations management, 11(3): 313-339.
10. Anggraini, D., Hamiza, A., Doktoralina, C. M., & Anah, S. (2018). Application of supply chain management practices in banks: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 418-427.
11. Apte, U. M. & Mason, R. O. 1995. Global disaggregation of information intensive services. Management science, 41(7):1250-1262.
12. Arunkumar N, Karunamoorthy L, Makeshwaraa NU (2007). An optimization technique for vendor selection with quantity discount using Genetic algorithm J. Ind. Eng. Int. 3(4): 1-13.
13. Bahli, B. & Rivard, S. 2005. Validating measures of information technology outsourcing risk factors. Omega, 33: 175-187.
14. Baldwing, L., Irani, Z., & Love, P. (2001). Outsourcing information systems: Drawing lessons from a banking case study. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 15–24.
15. Barbarosoglu, G. & Yazgac, T. 1997. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and inventory management journal, 38(1): 14-21.
16. Bayazit, O. (2006). “Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions”, Benchmarking An International journal, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 566-79.
17. Beaumont, N. & Sohal, A. 2004. Outsourcing in Australia. International journal of operations and production management, 24(7): 688-700.
18. Beulen, E., Fenema, P. V., & Currie, W. 2005. From application outsourcing to infrastructure management: Extending the offshore outsourcing portfolio. European management journal, 23(2): 133-144.
19. Busi, M. 2008. Editorial. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 1, 5–11.
20. Business Dynamics.J. Sterman. 2000. John Wiley and Sons.
21. Canez, L. E., Platts, K. W., & Probert, D. R. 2000. Developing a framework for make or buy decision. International journal of operations and production management, 20(11): 1313-1330.
22. Chan, F. T. S. & Chan, H. K. 2004. Development of the supplier selection model- a case study in the advanced technology industry. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part B: 1807-1824.
23. Chan FTS, Kumar N (2007). Global Supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach Omega, 35(4): 417-431.
24. Chen, W.K., Nalluri, V., Lin, M.L. and Lin, C.T., 2021. Identifying decisive socio-political sustainability barriers in the supply chain of banking sector in India: Causality analysis using ISM and MICMAC. Mathematics, 9(3), p.240.
25. Collins R, Bechler K (1999). Outsourcing in the chemical and automotive industries: Choice or Competetive imperative? J. Supply Chain Management. 35 (4): 4-11.
26. Coward, C. (2003). Looking beyond India: Factors that shape the global outsourcing decisions of small and medium sized companies in America. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 13(11), 1–12.
27. Edunjobi, T.E., 2024. The integrated banking-supply chain (IBSC) model for FMCG in emerging markets. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(4), pp.531-545.
28. Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. 2000. The effects of global outsourcing strategies on participants’ attitudes and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Manpower, 21, 112–128.
29. Fill, C. & Visser, E. 2000. The outsourcing dilemma: a composite approach to make or buy decision. Management decision, 38(1): 43-50.
30. Gencer C, Gurpinar D (2007). Analytic network process n supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm Appl. Math. Modell. 31 (11): 2475-2486.
31. Grover, V. & Teng, J. T. C. 1993. The decision to outsource information systems functions. Journal of systems management, 44(11): 34-38.
32. Handfield, R. B. 1994. US global sourcing: Patterns of development. International journal of operations and production management, 14(6): 40-51.
33. Harland, C., Knight, L., Lemming, R., & Walker, H. 2005. Outsourcing: Assessing the risks and benefits for organizations, sectors, and nations. International journal of operations and production management, 25(9): 831-850.
34. Jenner, G., 2009. Airlines Deepen Ties with Outsourcing Partners. http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/airlines-deepen-ties-with-outsourcing-partners- 325543/.
35. Jharkharia, S. & Shankar, R. 2005. Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, article in press: corrected proof, accepted 30 June 2005.
36. Jharkharia S., Shankar R. 2007. “Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach”; The International Journal of Management Science, 274 – 289.
37. Kahraman, C. Cebeci, U. & Ulukan, Z. 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management, 16(6): 382-394.
38. King, W. R. 2005. Outsourcing becomes more complex. Information systems management, 22(2): 89-90.
39. Kokangul A, Susuz Z 2009. Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount Appl. Math. Modell. 33(3): 1417-1429.
40. Krause, D. R., Pagell, M., & Curkovic, S. 2001. Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing. Journal of operations management, 19(4): 497-512.
41. Kubat C, Yuce B 2006. Supplier selection with genetic algorithm and fuzzy AHP proceedings of 5th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing systems: 1382-1401.
42. Kumar, S., Aquino, E., & Anderson, E. 2007. Application of a process methodology and a strategic decision model for business process outsourcing. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 6, 323–342.
43. Kumar, S., & Eickhoff, J. 2006. Outsourcing: When and how should it be done? Information Knowledge Systems Management, 5, 235–259.
44. Kuo RJ, Hong SY, Huang YC 2010a. Integration of particle swarm optimization-based fuzzy neural network and artificial neural network for supplier selection Appl. Math. Modell. 34(12): 3976-3990.
45. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC 2010b. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection J. Cleaner Prod. 18(12).1161-1170.
46. Lacity M., Hirschheim R. 1995. “Beyond the information systems outsourcing bandwagon”, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Lam KC, Tao R, Lam MCK (2010). A material suplier selection model for property developers using fuzzy principle component analysis autom. Constr. 19(5): 608-618.
48. Lee AHI (2009). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert syst. Appl. 36(2): 2879-2893.
49. Lee, S. 2010. Global outsourcing: A different approach to an understanding of sport labor migration. Global Business Review, 11, 153–165.
50. Leenders Ml, Fearon HF, Flynn AE, Johnson PF (2002). Purchasing and supply management. New York: McGraw –Hill.
51. Li, M., & Burden, W. 2002. Outsourcing sport marketing operations by NCAA Division I athletic programs: An exploratory study. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11, 226–232.
52. Liao CN, Kao Hp (2010). Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming Comp. Ind. Eng. 58(4): 571-577.
53. Liu, F. F. & Hai, H. L. 2005. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International journal of production economics, 97: 308-317.
54. Majumder, M.I. and Habib, M.M., 2022. Supply chain management in the banking industry: a literature review. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 10-20.
55. Mello, J., Theodore, S., & Terry, E. 2008. A model of logistics of outsourcing strategy. Transportation Journal, 47(4), 5–25.
56. Monczka RM, Hanfield RB (2005). Purchasing and supply chain management (3rd edition). Thomso South-Western.
57. Mohanty, R. P. & Deshmukh, S. G. 1993. Use of analytic hierarchy process for evaluating sources of supply. International journal of physical distribution & logistics, 23(3): 22-28.
58. Mukherji, S., & Ramachandran, J. 2007. Outsourcing: Practice and searching of a theory. IIMB Management Review, 19, 103–110.
59. Narasimhan R (1983). An analytical approach to supplier selection J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 19(4): 27-32.
60. Ng WL (2008). An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(3):1059-1067.
61. Ngwenyama, O. K. & Bryson, N. 1999. Making the information systems outsourcing decision: a transaction cost approach to analyzing outsourcing decision problems. European journal of operational research, 115: 351-367.
62. Nydick RL, Hill RP (1992). Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 25(2):1-6.
63. Nydick, R. L. & Hill, R. P. 1992. Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International journal of purchasing and materials management, 28(2): 31-36.
64. Ozgen D, Onut S, Gulsun B, Tuzkaya UR, Tuzkaya G (2008). A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Inf. Sci. 178(2):485-500.
65. Partovi, F. Y., Burton, J., & Banerjee, A. 1989. Application of analytical hierarchy process in operations management. International journal of operations and production management, 10(3): 5-19.
66. Pearson JL, Ellram LM (1995). Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms. J. Small Bus. Manag. 33(4): 53-60.
67. Real-Time Technology Solutions. 2007. Statistics related to offshore outsourcing. New York: Real-Time Technology Solutions. (http://www.rtts.net/outsourcing/statistics/).
68. Rajan, R., & Srivastava, S. 2007. Global outsourcing of services: Issues and implications. Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 9(1), 39–40.
69. Saaty, T. L. & Kearns, K. P. 1985. Analytical planning: the organization of systems. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press Inc.
70. Saaty, T. L. 1986. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 32(7): 841-855.
71. Saaty, T. L. 1989. Decision making, scaling, and number crunching. Decision sciences, 20(2): 404-409.
72. Smith, M. A., Mitra, S., & Narisimhan, S. 1996. Offshore outsourcing of software development and maintenance: A framework for issues. Information & management, 31: 165-175.
73. Sridhar, S. S. & Balachandran, B. V. 1997. Incomplete information, task assignment, and managerial control systems. Management science, 43(6): 764-778.
74. Swenson, D. L. 2004. Entry costs and outsourcing decisions: evidence from the US overseas assembly provision. The North American journal of economics and finance, 15: 267-286.
75. Swenson, D. L. 2005. Overseas assembly and country sourcing choices. Journal of international economics, 66: 107-130.
76. Teng, J. T. C., Cheon, M. J., & Grover, V. 1995. Decisions to outsource information systems functions: testing a strategy-theoretic discrepancy model. Decision sciences, 26(1): 75-103.
77. Thomas, P. 2005. The journal report: small business. Make it: in a global economy, it isn’t easy to transform an idea into a product. Wall Street journal: R6. New York.
78. Tracey, M. & Tan, C. L. 2001. Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply chain management, 6(3/4): 174-188.
79. Udo, G. G. 2000. Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision. Industrial management & data systems. 100(9): 421-429.
80. Venkatraman, N. V. 2004. Offshoring without guilt. MIT Sloan management review, 45(3): 14-16.
81. Vestring, T., Rouse, T., & Reinert, U. 2005. Hedge your offshoring bets. MIT Sloan management review, 46(3): 27-29.
82. Vokurka, R. J., Choobineh, J., & Vadi, L. 1996. A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential suppliers. International journal of operations and production management, 16(12): 106-127.
83. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Desai, A. 2000. Vendor: a structured approach to vendor selection and negotiation. Journal of business logistics, 21(1): 135-167.
84. Simpson PM, Siguaw JA, White SC. 2002. Measuring the performance of suppliers: An analysis of evaluation process J. Supply Chain Manag. 38(1): 29-41.
85. Spekman RE 1988. Strategic supplier selection: understanding long-term buyer relationships Bus. Horizons 31(4):75-81.
86. Winser JD, Leong GK, Tan KC 2008. Principles of supply chain management- A balanced approach. Thomson.
87. Xia W, Wu Z. 2007. Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments Omega, 35(5): 494-504.
88. Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W., 2007. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learnin programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications 32, 1028e1044.
89. Tsai, W.H., Chou, W.C., 2009. Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (Part 1), 1444e1458.
90. United Nations Development Program. Defining Good Governance as a nice governance.
91. Saaty, T. (2005). “Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
92. Schniederjans M. (2007). “Focused issue on operations research and outsourcing”, Computers & Operations Research 34. 3515
93. Wang, J.J., Yang, D.L., 2007. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information system outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3691e3700.
94. Yahya, S. & Kingsman, B. 1999. Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development program: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of the operational research society. 50: 916-930.
95. Yang, C. & Chen, B. (2006). “Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and gray relational analysis”, Journal of Manufacturing.
96. Yang, D.H., Kim, S., Nam, C., Min, J.W., 2007. Developing a decision model for business process outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3769e3778.
97. Yang, C. & Huang, J. B. 2000. A decision model for IS outsourcing. International journal of information management, 20: 225-239.
98. Yurdakul, M. Ic, Y. T. 2004. AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey. International journal of production economics, 88: 264-289.