دانش سرمایه‌گذاری

دانش سرمایه‌گذاری

مدلسازی پویای بانکداری پایدار با رویکرد بهبود عملکرد مالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مهندسی مالی، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ابهر، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد و مدیریت مالی، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ابهر، ایران
3 استاد تمام، گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت مالی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
در مسیر گذار به بانکداری پایدار، بهبود عملکرد مالی بانک‌ها مستلزم بازنگری در ساختارهای عملیاتی و سیاست‌گذاری‌های کلان است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدلی پویا برای ارتقاء عملکرد مالی در شرایط بانکداری پایدار، به طراحی، شبیه‌سازی و تحلیل یک مدل پویایی سیستم در نظام بانکی پرداخته است. مدل پیشنهادی با تمرکز بر شاخص‌های ROA، ROE، سود انباشته، جذب سپرده و سرمایه‌گذاری در فناوری، ساختاری علی و رفتاری را ارائه می‌دهد که تعاملات میان متغیرهای مالی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی را در بازه 1397 تا 1403، به‌صورت پویا بازنمایی می‌کند.
شبیه‌سازی مدل در بازه زمانی ۱۴۰۴ تا ۱۴۱۰ نشان داد که اعمال سیاست‌های پایدار موجب بهبود قابل توجه در شاخص‌های عملکردی بانک شده و مسیر حرکت به سوی بهبود عملکرد مالی را هموار می‌سازد. در بخش سناریوپردازی، سه سیاست اصلی شامل تأمین مالی فناوری‌های پیشرفته، توسعه تسهیلات سبز، و افزایش تعهد حاکمیت به اصول ESG مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که هر یک از این سیاست‌ها اثرات متفاوتی بر ابعاد عملکردی بانک دارند و ترکیب آن‌ها بیشترین اثر هم‌افزاینده را ایجاد می‌کند. تحلیل حساسیت مدل نیز بیانگر واکنش‌پذیری مناسب شاخص‌ها نسبت به محرک‌های سیاستی بود.
یافته‌های پژوهش با مطالعات پیشین در حوزه بانکداری پایدار هم‌راستا بوده و در عین حال، نوآوری‌هایی نظیر مدل‌سازی صریح شاخص‌هایESG، تعریف پویا برای اعتماد مشتریان و طراحی حلقه‌های بازخورد چندلایه را ارائه کرده است. مدل پیشنهادی می‌تواند به‌عنوان ابزاری راهبردی برای تدوین استراتژی‌های عملیاتی، ارزیابی سناریوهای آینده‌نگر و تصمیم‌گیری‌های کلان در نظام بانکی ایران مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Dynamic Modeling of Sustainable Banking with an Approach to Improving Financial Performance

نویسندگان English

Ayat Sepehri 1
Farid Askari 2
Ali Esmaeilzadeh Maghari 3
Mirfeiz Fallah 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Economics and Financial Management, Ab.C, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics and Financial Management, Ab.C, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Accounting, CT.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Financial Management, CT.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

In the transition to sustainable banking, improving the financial performance of banks requires a review of operational structures and macro-policies. The present study, with the aim of providing a dynamic model for improving financial performance in sustainable banking conditions, has designed, simulated, and analyzed a system dynamics model in the banking system. The proposed model, focusing on ROA, ROE, retained earnings, deposit attraction, and investment in technology, presents a causal and behavioral structure that dynamically represents the interactions between financial, social, and environmental variables in the period 1397 to 1403.
Simulation of the model in the period 1404 to 1410 showed that implementing sustainable policies led to significant improvements in bank performance indicators and paved the way for improving financial performance. In the scenario section, three main policies were examined, including financing advanced technologies, developing green facilities, and increasing the government's commitment to ESG principles. The results showed that each of these policies has different effects on the performance dimensions of the bank and their combination creates the greatest synergistic effect. The sensitivity analysis of the model also indicated the appropriate responsiveness of the indicators to policy stimuli.
The research findings are in line with previous studies in the field of sustainable banking and at the same time, it has presented innovations such as explicit modeling of ESG indicators, dynamic definition of customer trust and design of multi-layer feedback loops. The proposed model can be used as a strategic tool for formulating operational strategies, assessing future scenarios and making macro-decisions in the Iranian banking system.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable banking
bank financial performance
return on assets
return on equity
carbon emissions
  1.  

    1. Bathmanathan, V., & Hironaka, C. (2016). Sustainability and business: What is green corporate image? Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Renewable Energy and Technologies, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 23–25 February 2016, 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012049
    2. Brogi, M., & Lagasio, V. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1704
    3. Chen, Y., & Volz, U. (2021). Scaling up sustainable investment through blockchain-based project bonds. ADB-IGF Special Working Paper Series “Fintech to Enable Development, Investment, Financial Inclusion, and Sustainability.
    4. Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.024
    5. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
    6. Duderstadt, H. (2021). German Banks' Operationalisation of Sustainability-Decision-Making Frameworks in German Banks' Corporate Client Departments (Doctoral dissertation, University of Worcester).
    7. Forcadell, F.J., Aracil, E., Úbeda, F. (2020). “The impact of corporate sustainability and digitalization on international banks’ performance”. Global Policy, 11, 18–27.
    8. Gokten, P. O., & Gokten, S. (2019). Sustainability Reporting and Multilevel Governance. Multi-Level Governance in Developing Economies, 140–162. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5547-6.ch006
    9. Hu, Y. P., Lin, C. W., & Hariyadi, E. (2024). Achieving Sustainability in Banking through Smart Product-Service Systems: An Integrated Robust Fuzzy DEMATEL. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues14(5), 81-91.
    10. Hasan, M., Hoque, A., Abedin, M. Z., & Gasbarro, D. (2024). FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human-and machine-generated processing. International review of financial analysis95, 103473
    11. Krisciukaityte, K., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2023). Linking financial performance and efficiency to sustainability in banking sector: A literature synthesis. Journal of Business Economics and Management24(3), 506-526.
    12. Kumar, V.; Christodoulopoulou, A. Sustainability and branding: An integrated perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2014, 43, 6–15. [CrossRef]
    13. Khan, I., Amin, M. Y., & Akbar, S. FINTECH ADOPTION AND SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE IN BANKING INSTITUTIONS: THE ROLE OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION.
    14. Lawrence, L., & Thomas, T. (2018). Sustainability Reporting in ASEAN Countries. In Asean Csr Network
    15. Mochlasin, M. A. (2024). Sustainable finance and ESG; risk, management, regulations and implications for financial institutions.
    16. McCunn, L. J., & Gifford, R. (2012). Do green offices affect employee engagement and environmental attitudes? Architectural Science Review, 55(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.667939
    17. Malik, M. S., Irfan, M., & Munir, S. (2024). Developing a Sustainable Finance Index and Its Implications on Inter-Intra Banking Sector. Sage Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271232
    18. Nwagwu, I. (2020). “Driving sustainable banking in Nigeria through responsible management education: The case of Lagos Business School”, The International Journal of Management Education, 18
    19. Ozbek, C., Tunca, S., Balcioglu, Y. S., & Ozer, G. (2025). Governance Indicators in Sustainable Banking: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis for Enhanced Sustainability. Sustainability17(3), 1062.
    20. Riegler, M. (2023). Towards a definition of sustainable banking-a consolidated approach in the context of guidelines and strategies. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility8(1), 5.
    21. Srairi, S. (2025). How does ESG performance affect bank performance? A comparative analysis of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1-32.
    22. Soni, G., Kumar, S., Mahto, R. V., Mangla, S. K., Mittal, M. L., & Lim, W. M. (2022). Adecision-making framework for industry 4.0 technology implementation: The case  of FinTech and sustainable supply chain finance for SMEs. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121686
    23. Sani, K. F., Gbadamosi, A., & Al-Abdulrazak, R. R. (2024). Sustainability on the horizon? An investigation into sustainable banking practices in an emerging economy. Society and Business Review19(4), 553-576.https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-09-2023-0275
    24. Taliento, M., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2019). Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe. Sustainability, 11(6), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061738
    25. Torre Olmo, B., Cantero Saiz, M., & Sanfilippo Azofra, S. (2021). Sustainable Banking, Market Power, and Efficiency: Effects on Banks’ Profitability and Risk. Sustainability, 13(3), 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031298
    26. UNEP. (2023). Principles for Responsible Banking. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unepfi.org/banking/bankingprinciples/
    27. Xulu, S. S. (2022). Assessing South African Banks’ Performance on the Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Considerations in Their Corporate Strategies and Decision Making Process. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
    28. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
    29. Zion, Daniel, & Adams, Ray. (2024). Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Financial Control Systems.