presenting a regulatory governance model for the country:s industrial development in medical equipment based on databased theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Alireza Bashiri 1
Gholamreza Memarzadeh Tehran 2
hajieh rajabi farjad 3
Zahra Moghimi 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Government Management, Emirates Branch, Islamic Azad University of Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Government Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Human Resources Management, Amin University of Law Enforcement
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Se.C, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
10.30495/jik.2025.78153.4647
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to examine and formulate a regulatory governance model for the country's industrial development in medical equipment. Given that the country's industrial development in medical equipment is used to ensure health and promote the general health of the society, therefore, in order to maintain national health and maintain social health in the domestic and foreign dimensions, determining a model for implementing regulatory governance and achieving these goals can be an effective step in achieving regulatory governance for the country's industrial development in medical equipment. The present study has studied and examined the regulatory governance model for the country's industrial development in medical equipment. The methodology used in this study is quantitative-qualitative (mixed), in which in the qualitative part, using the snowball sampling method, 14 experts were identified and in-depth interviews were conducted with them until the theoretical saturation stage was reached and the effective factors in formulating a regulatory governance model were identified. The findings indicate that 25 components are effective in regulatory governance in medical equipment. Therefore, according to the experts and their consensus, in the regulatory governance of the country's medical equipment development, the regulatory institution platform index ranks first; post-release monitoring and evaluation and technical and quality standards rank second; macroeconomic stability ranks fourth; and laws and regulations and life cycle management of medical equipment jointly rank fifth, and the remaining indicators are ranked next.
  • افتخاری؛ رکن‌الدین (1397). حکمروایی و توسعه پایدار سکونتگاه‌ها، انجمن علمی برنامه‌ریزی شهری و توسعه منطقه‌ای دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی وانجمن علمی آمایش سرزمین دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  • امیری، ایوب؛ رزقی رستمی، علیرضا؛ گلرد، پروانه و صالحی صدقیانی، جمشید (1397). تدوین مدل حکمرانی خوب در بخش دفاعی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران جنوب.
  • آون، هیوز. ترجمه الوانی، خلیلی شورینی ومعمارزاده (1399). مدیریت دولتی نوین: نگرشی راهبردی، سیر اندیشه‌ها، مفاهیم ونظریه‌ها. تهران: انتشارات مروارید.
  • دانایی فرد، حسن (1402). اثرسنجی تنظیم‌گرها به عنوان ابزاری برای اِشکال‌زدایی در فرایند کشورداری: فهم خردمایه‌ها، فرایند اجرا و چالش‌های فرارو، مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران دوره 6، شماره 4، 1-28.
  • راسخ و حسینی کرابی (۱۳۹۵). مفهوم رگولاسیون در قلمرو حقوق. دوفصلنامه دانشنامه حقوق اقتصادی. شماره ۸. ص32
  • صفری نسرانی، حسین، کهندل، مهدی نوربخش، مهوش و نوربخش پریوش (1402). تأثیر حکمرانی نظارتی بر توسعه منابع انسانی با نقش میانجی رفتار سیاسی کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران، فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی ورزش و جوانان، شماره 60، 127-144.
  • مرکز پژوهش‎های مجلس شورای اسلامی (1397). نظام ملی تنظیم‌گری، مفهوم تنظیم‌گری و ارتباط آن با نظام حکمرانی، معاونت پژوهشهای اقتصادی، دفتر: مطالعات اقتصاد بخش عمومی، کد موضوعی: 230، شماره مسلسل: 15940
  • معمارزاده، غلامرضا؛ محمدی­ها، هاله؛ عظیمی، پرهان (1400). طراحی مدل ارتقای نظام سلامت کشور با تأکید بر راهبردهای حکمرانی، مجله پیاورد سلامت، دوره 15، شماره 3، ص 290-272.
  • موسوی سیدعلی، مظهری محمد، مولائی آیت، ملکوتی هشجین سیدحسین. نسبت حکمرانی تنظیمی و تحول اداره عمومی در فرانسه؛ حرکت از نظم دولت محور به سوی تکثرگراییِ ساختارمند. حقوق اداری. ۱۴۰۲; ۱۰ (۳۵) :۱۸۷-۲۱۰.
  • هداوند، مهدی (1384). حکمرانی خوب، توسعه و حقوق شهروندی، حقوق اساسی شماره4، صفحه 52.
  • Adams, Tracy L., (2013). Professional Self-Regulation and the Public Interest in Canada, presented at the ISA RC52 Interim Conference on Challenging Professionalism, The School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Lisbon, Portugal, November 29.
  • Benz, A., (2011). Governance - Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept?, In Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • DÖHLER, M. (2011). Regulation. In the Sage Handbook of Governance, ed. M. Bevier. Los Angeles and London: Sage, pp. 524 n.4.DORF, M. 2003. The domain of reflexive law. Columbia Law Review, 103: 384, 386.
  • Fryatt R, Bennett S & Soucat A. (2023). Health sector governance: Should we be investing more? British Medical Journal Global Health 2)2(: 1-6
  • Kim, Junhewk; Kim, So Yoon; Kim, Eun-Ae; Sim, Jin-Ah; Lee, Yuri & Kim, Hannah (2024). Developing a Framework for Self-regulatory Governance in Healthcare AI Research: Insights from South Korea, Perspective Open access, Published: Volume 16, pages 391–406.
  • Mishra, Brajesh (2023). Profiling regulatory governance framework to strengthen industry performance: Application of the fuzzy analytical hierarchical process, International Journal of Technology Policy and Management 23(3) DOI:10.1504/IJTPM.10058047.
  • OECD (2005), “The benefits of liberalizing product markets and reducing barriers to international trade and investment: the case of the United States and the European Union,” Economics Department Working Paper No. 432, OECD, Paris.
  • OECD (2023), “Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 356, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8f80a0e6-en.
  • OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, (2024). Regulatory Experimentation: Moving ahead on the Agile Regulatory Governance Agenda, the use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions/.
  • Offe, Claus, (2000). Civil Society and Social Order: Demarcating and Combining Market, State and Community, Revue Europeanness de Sociologies XLI.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Ribeiro, D. (2018), Adaptive Regulatory Impact Assessment: Beyond the Foresight-Hindsight Divide, PhD Thesis, Unpublished.
  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, (2002). Towards a New Legal Common Sense, Butterworths, Londo.
  • Scott, Colin (2002). Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of
    Contemporary Governance, Journal of Law and Society 29.
  • Colin (2003). Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the PostRegulatory State, National Europe Centre Paper No. 100.
  • Thomas M, Zhang Y-F (2020) Regulatory reform and governance: a survey of selected developing and transition economies. Institute for Development Policy and Management, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, UK and World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA, pp 1–28