Designing a Structural Model of the Impact of Financial Narrative Disclosure on the Credibility of Financial Reports

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. candidate, Accounting Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University
3 Associate Professor, Financial Management Department, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Adiban Higher Education Institute, Garmsar, Semnan Province, Iran
10.22034/jik.2026.24250
Abstract
Financial narrative, by combining intra-organizational factors (management incentives, transparency culture), exogenous factors (regulations, stakeholder pressure), and content characteristics (presentation structure, level of transparency), directly shapes the credibility of financial reports; in such a way that the more the narrative is based on supporting data, analytical balance (simultaneous mention of opportunities and risks), and intentional transparency, the content credibility of the report increases by strengthening components such as corporate governance quality, external validation capability, and coherence with technological innovations. The method used in this research is fieldwork and factor analysis. The statistical population of this research included people active in the accounting and auditing profession, and a questionnaire was completed in 1404. The method used in this research was a combination. Initially, the multifaceted grounded theory method was used to identify the research variables using interviews and searches in previous research. The influential factors were finalized using the Lavosheh index. Finally, the research questions were analyzed using factor analysis. Finally, the model of the impact of the type of financial narrative on the credibility of the content of financial reports was presented. The results showed that the results of the research showed that financial narrative, including (internal factors (inherent to the company), external factors (environmental), content factors, presentation structure, level of transparency) has a direct effect on the credibility of the content of financial reports, including (quality of corporate governance and supervisory structure, characteristics of report content, external validation, contextual and behavioral factors, technology and innovation in reporting).
Keywords

  1. عباس زاده, محمدرضا, صالحی, مهدی, & نسیم طوسی, فرهاد. (1398). بررسی عوامل موثر بر خوانایی گزارش حسابرس: یک رویکرد زبانی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی, 16(64), 31-57.
  2. فغفورمغربی, یگانه, سجادی, سید حسین, اثنی عشری, حمیده, & رضاییان, علی. (1399). تاثیر احساس زبانی، خوانایی و سبک پردازش اطلاعات (خبرگی) بر قضاوت سرمایه‌گذاران: شواهد آزمایشی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی, 17(65), 1-34.
  3. لعل بار، علی و طلایی، محسن و شرعیاتی، سجاد،1402،تاثیر سرمایه انسانی بر خوانایی و لحن گزارش حسابرسی،سیزدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی حسابداری، مدیریت و نوآوری در کسب و کار،تهران،
  4. مسیح آبادی، ابوالقاسم و تقوی مقدم، علی،1394،نگاهی به گزارشگری مالی و حسابداری از دیدگاه داستان و روایت،سومین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری،تبریز،
  5. مهدوی، رحمان و آذین فر، کاوه و داداشی، ایمان و برزگر، قدرت ا...،1401،بررسی تاثیر خوانایی گزارش مالی بر اعتبار تجاری با تاکید بر نقش توانایی مدیریت در شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران،
  6. ناظم، الهام،1402،بررسی اثر سازو کارهای راهبری شرکتی بر قابلیت فهم و خوانایی گزارش های مالی در شرکت های پذیرفته شده بورس اوراق بهادار تهران،دومین کنفرانس ملی تحولات نوین در مطالعات مالی، اقتصادی و حسابداری،مراغه،

1.      Abed, S., Al-Najjar, B., & Roberts, C. (2016). Measuring annual report narratives disclosure: Empirical evidence from forward-looking information in the UK prior the financial crisis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(4/5), 338-361.‏

2.      Boone, J., Hao, J., Linthicum, C., & Pham, V. (2024). Impression management strategy—The relationship between accounting narrative thematic bias and financial graph distortion. The British Accounting Review, 101389.‏

3.      Burgers, Christian, Elly A Konijn, Gerard J Steen, and Marlies A R Iepsma. 2015. “Making Ads Less Complex, yet More Creative and Persuasive: The Effects of Conventional Metaphors and Irony in Print Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 34 (3): 515–32.

4.      Carnevale, Marina, David Luna, and Dawn Lerman. 2017. “Brand Linguistics: A Theory-Driven Framework for the Study of Language in Branding.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 34 (2): 572–91.

5.      Chang, Y. T., & Stone, D. N. (2023). Impression management in public sector audit proposals: language and fees. European Accounting Review, 32(2), 311-343.‏

6.      Cliff, J.E., Langton, N., & Aldrich, H.E. (2005). Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization Studies, 26(1), 63-91.

7.      Dandago, K. I., & Modibbo, A. (2022). ACCOUNTING NARRATIVES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT IN CORPORATE REPORTING: A REVIEW. Annals of the University of Craiova, Economic Sciences Series, 2(50).‏

8.      De Souza, J. A. S., Rissatti, J. C., Rover, S., & Borba, J. A. (2019). The linguistic complexities of narrative accounting disclosure on financial statements: An analysis based on readability characteristics. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 59-74.‏

9.      Dholakia, Nikhilesh. 2016. “Marketing as Mystification.” Marketing Theory 16 (3):401–26.

10.  El-Haj, M. (2019, September). Multiling 2019: Financial narrative summarisation. In Proceedings of the Workshop MultiLing 2019: Summarization Across Languages, Genres and Sources (pp. 6-10).‏

11.  El-Haj, M., Litvak, M., Pittaras, N., & Giannakopoulos, G. (2020, December). The financial narrative summarisation shared task (FNS 2020). In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Financial Narrative Processing and MultiLing Financial Summarisation (pp. 1-12).‏

12.  Fakhfakh, M. (2016a). Linguistic features and legibility of the consolidated audit reports: An original investigation from the Tunisian case. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1234360.‏

13.  Fakhfakh, M. (2016b). Linguistic performance and legibility of auditors’ reports with modified opinions: An advanced investigation based on the ISAs on audit reports. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(1), 105-130.‏

14.  Fakhfakh, M. 2015”The readability of international illustration of auditor’s report: An advanced reflectionon the compromise between normative principles and linguistic requirements”. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science(2015)

15.  Finlayson, A. (2014). Proving, pleasing and persuading? Rhetoric in contemporary British politics. The Political Quarterly, 85(4), 428-436.‏

16.  Gisbert, A. (2021). Financial narratives. Moreno-Sandoval, A “FINANCIAL NARRATIVE PROCESSING IN SPANISH”, Ed. Tirant lo Blanch.‏

17.  Gretry, Anaïs, Csilla Horváth, Nina Belei, and Allard C R van Riel. 2017. “‘Don’t Pretend to Be My Friend!’ When an Informal Brand Communication Style Backfires on Social Media.” Journal of Business Research 74: 77–89.

18.  Grint, K., & Case, P. (1998). The violent rhetoric of re-engineering: Management consultancy on the offensive. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 557-577.

19.  Hakala, Henri, Laura Niemi, and Marko Kohtamäki. 2017. “Online Brand Community Practices and the Construction of Brand Legitimacy.” Marketing Theory 17 (4): 537–58.

20.  Hatzisavvidou, S. (2017). Disputatious rhetoric and political change: The case of the Greek anti-mining movement. Political Studies, 65(1), 215-230.‏

21.  Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 755-776.

22.  Huhmann, Bruce A, and Pia A Albinsson. 2012. “Does Rhetoric Impact Advertising Effectiveness with Liking Controlled?” European Journal of Marketing 46 (11/12): 1476–1500.

23.  Iglesias, Oriol, and Eduard Bonet. 2012. “Persuasive Brand Management: How Managers Can Influence Brand Meaning When They Are Losing Control over It.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 25 (2): 251–64. Liu, P. (2024). Do Linguistic and Accounting Reporting Complexity Affect Audit Fee?.‏

24.  john L. Abernathy, Feng Guo, Thomas R. Kubick, and Adi Masli (2019) Financial Statement Footnote Readability and Corporate Audit Outcomes. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory: May 2019, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 1-26.

25.  McQuarrie, Edward F, and David Glen Mick. 2009. “A Laboratory Study of the Effect of Verbal Rhetoric versus Repetition When Consumers Are Not Directed to Process Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 28 (2): 287–312.

26.  Miles, Chris. 2014. “The Rhetoric of Managed Contagion: Metaphor and Agency in the Discourse of Viral Marketing.” Marketing Theory 14 (1): 3–18.

27.  Panigyrakis, G., Panopoulos, A., & Koronaki, E. (2020). All we have is words: applying rhetoric to examine how social media marketing activities strengthen the connection between the brand and the self. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 699-718.‏

28.  Phillips, Barbara J, and Edward F McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4 (1–2): 113–36.

29.  Preece, Chloe, and Finola Kerrigan. 2015. “Multi-Stakeholder Brand Narratives: An Analysis of the Construction of Artistic Brands.” Journal of Marketing Management 31 (11–12): 1207–30.

30.  Rindova, V.P., Becerra, M., & Contardo, I. (2004). Enacting competitive wars: Competitive activity, language games, and market consequences. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 670-686.

31.  Sköldberg, K. (1994). Tales of change: Public administration reform and narrative mode. Organization Science, 5(2), 219-238.

32.  Wilk, Violetta, Paul Harrigan, and Geoffrey N Soutar. 2018. “NAVIGATING ONLINE BRAND ADVOCACY (OBA): AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 26 (1–2): 99–116.